Cherryhill
Overview & Key Facts
Cherryhill occupies a quiet stretch of Lorong Lew Lian in District 19, just off Upper Serangoon Road — a pocket of the north-east that has quietly matured into one of the most liveable suburban corridors in Singapore. Developed by Wing Tai Holdings (through subsidiary Winwards Investment Pte Ltd), the development was completed in 1994 and comprises 163 units across a compact freehold site.
Wing Tai’s reputation for design-forward, quality-conscious developments — they are the same group behind The Crest, Le Nouvel Ardmore, and The M — lends Cherryhill a construction pedigree that exceeds what the unassuming address might suggest. At 30-plus years old, the development is firmly in the “mature estate” category, but freehold tenure means the age carries none of the lease-decay anxiety that shadows its 99-year neighbours.
With 163 units, Cherryhill sits in a manageable mid-size sweet spot: large enough to support a reasonable suite of shared facilities, small enough that residents know their neighbours and maintenance decisions don’t require the politics of a 1,000-unit mega-condo. The development has traded consistently in the $1,600–$1,700 psf range over the past 12 months, with a median transaction price around S$1.745 million — positioning it as an accessible entry into freehold living in the Serangoon corridor.
Location & Connectivity
Cherryhill’s trump card is its proximity to Serangoon MRT interchange, just 480 metres away. This is a genuine walking-distance commute — six to seven minutes on foot — and the interchange serves both the North-East Line (direct to Dhoby Ghaut, Chinatown, HarbourFront) and the Circle Line (Botanic Gardens, Holland Village, one-north, Paya Lebar). For a freehold development at this price point, sub-500m MRT access is exceptionally rare in D19.
Bartley MRT on the Circle Line is 940 metres to the south, offering a second rail option for commuters heading toward MacPherson or Caldecott. Kovan MRT on the North-East Line is 1.35 km to the north-east, anchoring the Kovan heartland dining strip along Simon Road and Upper Serangoon Road.
For drivers, the development enjoys good expressway connectivity. The Central Expressway (CTE) and Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway (KPE) are both accessible within minutes. Orchard Road is roughly 15 minutes by car; the CBD about 20 minutes via CTE during off-peak hours.
Day-to-day convenience is excellent. NEX shopping mall — one of Singapore’s largest suburban malls with FairPrice Xtra, Serangoon Public Library, cinemas, and over 200 retail outlets — is a short walk from the Serangoon interchange. The Upper Serangoon Road shophouse strip provides a more traditional alternative: local kopitiams, wet markets, and neighbourhood shops that give the area its heartland character.
Schools & Education
2 primary schools within the 1 km Priority Phase balloting radius.
| School | Type | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Cedar Girls' Secondary School | secondary | Within 1 km |
| Cedar Primary School | primary | Within 1 km |
| Zhonghua Secondary School | secondary | Within 1 km |
| Zhonghua Primary School | primary | Within 1 km |
| Bartley Secondary School | secondary | Within 1 km |
| Serangoon Secondary School | secondary | ~1.1 km |
| Montfort Junior School | primary | ~1.1 km |
| Montfort Secondary School | secondary | ~1.2 km |
Facilities
At 163 units, Cherryhill was never designed to compete with the mega-condo resort experience. The facilities reflect its era and scale: a swimming pool, gymnasium, BBQ pavilions, a children’s playground, and landscaped communal gardens. There is no tennis court, function room, or the elaborate themed zones that characterise newer, larger developments.
What Wing Tai did deliver — and what has aged relatively well — is build quality in the common areas. The grounds are well-maintained for a development of this vintage, and the lower unit count means shared facilities are genuinely available when you want them, without the booking wars and overcrowding that plague developments three times Cherryhill’s size.
The development’s compact footprint also means maintenance fees remain reasonable by freehold standards. With only 163 units sharing the upkeep costs, the per-unit contribution is manageable — a consideration that becomes increasingly important as developments age and require cyclical repairs.
Unit Sizes & Layout
This is where Cherryhill’s 1994 vintage becomes an outright advantage. Units from this era were built to more generous spatial standards than anything coming to market today. Two-bedroom units offer the kind of floor area that modern developers would market as a three-bedroom, and master bedrooms comfortably accommodate king-sized beds with proper wardrobe runs — a luxury that has largely vanished from new launches.
Layouts are predominantly rectangular and efficient, with minimal wasted corridor space. The older building regulations meant fewer constraints on bedroom dimensions, and the results are liveable in a way that “efficient” new-build layouts often are not. Kitchens in larger units are enclosed by default — a configuration that many buyers now actively seek after the open-kitchen experiment proved incompatible with Asian cooking.
Ceiling heights are standard for the era but feel adequate. Natural ventilation is generally good across most stacks, benefiting from the low-rise surroundings and the development’s position away from major arterial roads. Units facing the internal courtyard enjoy the quietest environment; those with outward orientations capture more breeze but may pick up some ambient neighbourhood noise.
The unit mix leans toward family-sized configurations, which aligns with the development’s residential character and the surrounding school cluster. This is not a development designed for studio-dwelling singles or investor-oriented shoebox units — it is built for families who intend to live in it.
| Bedrooms | Transactions | Avg PSF | Avg Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BR | 1 | $1,749 | $1,600,000 |
| 3 BR | 6 | $1,451 | $1,639,667 |
| 4 BR | 9 | $1,276 | $1,992,454 |
Pricing & Market Position
Based on 16 recorded transactions, sale prices range from $1,370,000 to $2,688,888, averaging $1,835,631 (~$1,683 psf).
Rents range from $2,000 to $6,700 per month across 129 rental transactions. Current rental yield sits at approximately 2.4%.
Price Appreciation
From 2021 to 2026, the average PSF has appreciated by 61.9% (from $1,080 to $1,749 psf).
Neighbourhood Comparison
The competitive landscape around Cherryhill is instructive. Chuan Park ($2,596 psf, 99-year from 2024, 916 units) is the new-launch benchmark in the immediate area — a fresh development with modern facilities and full lease runway, but at a 57% psf premium and with leasehold tenure. Buyers choosing Chuan Park are paying for newness and lease length; buyers choosing Cherryhill are paying for freehold perpetuity and space at a fraction of the cost.
Florence Residences ($1,743 psf, 99-year from 2018, 1,410 units) and Affinity at Kovan ($1,698 psf, 99-year from 2018, 1,012 units) represent the recent-completion leasehold competition. Both offer modern facilities and larger-scale amenities, but at similar psf levels to Cherryhill — which means Cherryhill’s freehold tenure represents a genuine differentiator at near-equivalent pricing. The trade-off is older finishes versus newer everything.
Riverfront Residences ($1,586 psf, 99-year from 2018, 1,451 units) comes in below Cherryhill on psf but is located further from the MRT interchange and carries leasehold tenure. For pure value seekers willing to sacrifice freehold, Riverfront offers more modern facilities at a lower entry point — but the Hougang location is less central than Cherryhill’s Serangoon position.
The key question for any Cherryhill buyer is whether freehold tenure at $1,652 psf with renovation costs is better value than a 99-year lease at $1,700–$1,750 psf with move-in condition. For own-stay buyers with a 15+ year horizon, freehold almost always wins. For investors focused on rental yield and near-term capital gains, the newer leasehold options may deliver better returns in the medium term.
| Development | Tenure | TOP | Units | ~Avg PSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHERRYHILL | Freehold | 1994 | 163 | $1,683 |
| CHUAN PARK | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2024 | 2024 | 916 | $2,596 |
| THE FLORENCE RESIDENCES | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 | 2021 | 1,410 | $1,746 |
| RIVERFRONT RESIDENCES | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 | 2021 | 1,451 | $1,589 |
| AFFINITY AT SERANGOON | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2018 | 2021 | 1,012 | $1,699 |
| SERANGOON GARDEN ESTATE | Freehold | 2021 | — | $1,735 |
ShiokNest Scores
Our proprietary scoring system evaluates CHERRYHILL across multiple dimensions.
What Residents Say
“Very quiet and peaceful estate. The freehold status gives peace of mind, and being able to walk to Serangoon MRT interchange is a huge plus. The units are spacious compared to anything new you can buy today.”
— Owner-occupier, via property forum
“The facilities are basic — don’t expect a resort-style condo. But the location is unbeatable for the price, and the neighbours are mostly long-term residents, so it’s very safe and family-friendly.”
— Long-term resident, via property forum
“Had to do a full renovation when we moved in. The original fittings were from 1994 and it showed. But the bones of the unit are solid — Wing Tai quality. After renovation, it’s a lovely home with much more space than anything we could afford new.”
— Recent buyer, via property forum
The consistent themes across resident feedback are predictable for a development of this profile: praise for the location, MRT access, freehold status, and spacious layouts, balanced against acknowledgement that the facilities and fittings are showing their age. The community is described as predominantly owner-occupier families with a stable, long-term resident base — a social character that many buyers actively prefer over the transient feel of larger, investor-heavy developments.
Strengths & Weaknesses
- Freehold tenure — no lease decay, perpetual ownership
- Serangoon MRT interchange just 480m — genuine walkable commute
- Exceptionally strong school cluster (5 schools within 1 km)
- Spacious 1990s layouts — significantly larger than modern equivalents
- Wing Tai construction quality — solid structural bones
- NEX mall and heartland amenities within walking distance
- Mid-size 163 units — manageable MCST, no mega-condo politics
- Price gap vs new launches (37% cheaper psf than Chuan Park)
- Dual expressway access (CTE + KPE) for drivers
- Facilities are basic by 2026 standards — pool, gym, BBQ only
- Mandatory renovation spend — 1994 fittings need full refresh
- No tennis court, function room, or modern lifestyle amenities
- Low gross yield at 2.41% — below D19 average for investors
- Ageing facade and common areas show their 30+ years
- Limited capital upside compared to newer, repositioned stock
- En-bloc potential (52/100) is optionality, not a near-term catalyst
- Small unit count means fewer resale transactions and thinner liquidity
Verdict
Cherryhill makes a compelling case for a specific buyer profile: families who want freehold tenure, genuine MRT walkability, spacious 1990s-era layouts, and proximity to good schools — all without paying the $2,200+ psf premium that new launches in the Serangoon corridor now command. At around $1,652 psf, you are acquiring a freehold asset within 480 metres of an interchange station, in a mature neighbourhood with established amenities. That combination simply does not exist in new-build form at this price point.
The trade-offs are real but manageable. Facilities are modest by 2026 standards. Renovation expenditure is not optional — it is a certainty. The development won’t win any architectural beauty contests. But for own-stay buyers who prioritise substance over sparkle, these are acceptable costs of entry into what is fundamentally a well-located, well-built, freehold home.
The en-bloc angle deserves a measured assessment. At 52/100 on the en-bloc potential scale, Cherryhill has some of the ingredients — freehold tenure, 163 units (easier to achieve 80% consensus than a 1,000-unit development), and rising land values in the Serangoon growth corridor. But the site’s plot ratio limitations and the current market environment make a near-term collective sale unlikely. Buyers should treat en-bloc as a long-term optionality bonus, not a purchase thesis.
For investors, the numbers are less exciting. A gross yield of 2.41% on a median price of $1.745 million is below the D19 average, and rental demand at 126 transactions suggests steady but not exceptional tenant interest. Capital appreciation over the past five years has been solid (roughly $1,080 to $1,652 psf), but future upside will depend heavily on broader Serangoon corridor redevelopment momentum.