Icon

D2 (CCR) 99 yrs lease commencing from 2002

Located in District 2 (Anson, Tanjong Pagar), Icon is a 99-year leasehold condominium in the Core Central Region (CCR). Completed in 2007, the development comprises 646 units, on a lease that commenced in 2002. Sale and rental figures on this page are compiled from URA transaction records.

District 2 ·99 yrs lease commencing from 2002 ·Completed 2007
~$1,769 Avg PSF (12-month)
4.4% Rental yield
646 Total units
Category Ratings
Facilities
6.0
Unit size & layout
6.5
Value for money
7.5
Neighbourhood
8.0
MRT accessibility
9.0
Lease remaining
5.0

Overview & Key Facts

ICON is a 646-unit, 99-year leasehold condominium at Gopeng Street in District 2 — a 38-storey CBD tower developed by Far East Organization, Singapore’s largest private property developer, and completed in 2007. The development sits in the Core Central Region (CCR), anchored within the Tanjong Pagar precinct — a neighbourhood that has evolved from a historic Straits Chinese enclave into one of Singapore’s most dynamic live-work-eat districts. With 75 years remaining on its 99-year lease from 2002, ICON is now at a critical inflection point that every buyer must understand before committing.

The headline number that defines ICON’s investment case is not its PSF or its location — it is the 4.34% gross rental yield. In a market where most CCR condominiums struggle to break 3%, ICON delivers one of the highest yields in the Core Central Region, underpinned by an extraordinary 1,683 rental transactions on record. That is not a typo — 1,683 rentals from a 646-unit development. The average unit has been rented approximately 2.6 times, reflecting a tenant base that turns over regularly but is constantly replenished by the deep pool of CBD office workers who value the walk-to-work proposition. At $4,523/month average rent and $1,784 PSF, the rental math is compelling: you are buying a CCR address at 31–43% below competing newer condominiums and generating yield that rivals suburban developments with none of the location premium.

But there is a hard constraint that tempers the enthusiasm. The lease — 75 years remaining — has crossed the threshold where CPF usage restrictions begin to bite. Banks will also apply progressively tighter loan-to-value limits as the lease decays further. For a purely cash buyer seeking income, this is manageable. For a buyer relying on maximum CPF and mortgage leverage, the shrinking financing envelope is a structural headwind that will intensify with every passing year. ICON is, in essence, a high-yield income play with a built-in expiry date — and the entire buy/hold calculation hinges on whether the rental income accumulated over your holding period compensates for the lease decay.

Developer
LUCKY PINNACLE PTE LTD (FAR EAST)
Tenure
99 yrs lease commencing from 2002
Total units
646
TOP year
2007
District
2 — CCR
Street
GOPENG STREET
Lease remaining
~75 years (of 99)

Location & Connectivity

ICON occupies a position that is simultaneously CBD and neighbourhood — a rare combination in Singapore’s financial district. Gopeng Street sits within the Tanjong Pagar precinct, which unlike the sterile glass-tower corridors of Marina Bay or Raffles Place, retains the texture of a lived-in neighbourhood. Within a 5-minute walk, residents have access to Maxwell Food Centre (one of Singapore’s most famous hawker centres, home to Tian Tian Hainanese Chicken Rice), the shophouses of Duxton Hill and Keong Saik Road (craft cocktail bars, independent cafes, specialty restaurants), Tanjong Pagar Plaza Market and Food Centre, and the Chinatown Heritage Centre. This is not a food desert — this is arguably one of the best food neighbourhoods in Singapore.

MRT connectivity is exceptional and getting better. Tanjong Pagar MRT station (East-West Line) is just 280 metres away — a 3-minute walk. But the real story is the three additional MRT stations within 500 metres: Shenton Way (Thomson-East Coast Line, opened 2024) at 420 metres, Prince Edward Road (Circle Line) at 440 metres, and Maxwell (Thomson-East Coast Line) at 510 metres. Four MRT stations serving three separate lines, all within a 6-minute walk — a connectivity density that rivals even Marina One Residences. The recently opened Thomson-East Coast Line stations have materially upgraded the area’s transit accessibility, connecting residents directly to Orchard, Woodlands, and the East Coast corridor without line changes. For drivers, the Ayer Rajah Expressway (AYE) and Central Expressway (CTE) entrances are minutes away.

Tanjong Pagar — CBD with a soul
Unlike the Marina Bay financial district which empties after 7pm, the Tanjong Pagar precinct has genuine evening and weekend life. The Duxton Hill and Keong Saik Road bar and restaurant scene draws crowds nightly. Maxwell Food Centre operates into the evening. Ann Siang Hill and Club Street offer independent boutiques and galleries. The Greater Southern Waterfront redevelopment, which will transform the adjacent waterfront from Keppel to Marina South over the next two decades, promises to further enhance the precinct’s liveability with parks, waterfront promenades, and new residential supply. For ICON residents, this means the neighbourhood is getting more vibrant, not less.

The school situation is the primary lifestyle weakness. Cantonment Primary School is the nearest at 1.22 km — outside the priority 1 km enrollment radius that matters for primary school registration. There are no schools within 1 km. For families with young children, this is a meaningful disadvantage. For the professionals, couples, and investors who form ICON’s core demographic, it is irrelevant. The nearest supermarket options include FairPrice at Tanjong Pagar Plaza and specialty grocers in the Chinatown area — adequate for daily needs though not as convenient as developments with integrated retail.


Schools & Education

Nearby Schools
SchoolTypeDistance
Cantonment Primary Schoolprimary~1.2 km
Outram Secondary Schoolsecondary~1.4 km

Facilities

ICON’s facilities must be evaluated in context: this is a 19-year-old tower completed in 2007, and the amenity set reflects the expectations of that era rather than the resort-style extravagance of post-2015 launches. The development provides a swimming pool, wading pool, gymnasium, BBQ area, and function room — the essential amenities that residents need, without the proliferation of lightly-used themed pavilions and sky gardens that inflate maintenance fees in newer developments. For a 646-unit tower, the facilities-to-unit ratio is adequate, and the maintenance burden is correspondingly lighter.

The swimming pool is the primary recreational facility and is well-maintained. The gymnasium is functional though not large by current standards — residents who require a full-service gym will likely maintain an external membership, which is easily done given the proximity to CBD fitness chains. The BBQ area provides social entertaining space. A 24-hour security team manages access and building operations.

What ICON lacks in on-site amenities, it compensates for through location. The Tanjong Pagar precinct effectively functions as an extended amenity deck: Maxwell Food Centre replaces a private dining room, Duxton Hill replaces a wine bar, the nearby parks along the Southern Ridges trail system offer open-air recreation that no rooftop sky terrace can match. For residents who view amenities through the lens of what they actually use daily — rather than what looks good in a brochure — ICON’s compact facility set combined with its rich neighbourhood access is a reasonable trade-off. The lower maintenance fees that result from fewer shared facilities are a tangible financial benefit for yield-focused investors.

Age-related maintenance considerations
At 19 years old, ICON is entering the phase where building systems require significant capital expenditure. Lifts, water pumps, facade sealants, and air-conditioning systems in common areas will need upgrading or replacement over the next decade. Prospective buyers should review the MCST’s sinking fund balance and recent AGM minutes to understand the financial position for upcoming major maintenance. Well-managed older buildings can maintain quality, but deferred maintenance is a risk that compounds with building age.

Unit Sizes & Layout

ICON’s 646 units are distributed across a single 38-storey tower, offering a mix of studio, 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom configurations. The unit mix skews toward smaller types — consistent with its CBD location and the investor-oriented market that Far East Organization targeted during the mid-2000s launch. Unit sizes reflect the pre-shoebox era: even the compact types are typically more generous than the sub-400-sqft studios and sub-500-sqft 1-bedrooms that dominate current new launches. This size advantage translates directly to rental appeal, as tenants in the CBD market value functional living space.

Layouts are generally efficient for a 2007-vintage tower. The rectangular floor plate and single-tower design mean most units receive reasonable natural light and ventilation, though units on lower floors facing adjacent commercial buildings will experience limited views. Higher floors command meaningful premiums for CBD skyline and potentially partial sea views. The Gopeng Street address places the tower within the Tanjong Pagar cluster of residential towers, so buyers should check the specific stack and facing to understand the view corridor before committing.

Finishes are functional but dated by 2026 standards. Original bathroom and kitchen fittings from 2007 will likely need refreshing, and many tenanted units have already been updated by landlords seeking to maintain rental competitiveness. For investors, budgeting $20,000–$40,000 for a kitchen and bathroom refresh is realistic and can materially improve rental rates. The building’s structural quality — Far East Organization is known for solid construction — means the renovation investment goes into cosmetic updates rather than structural remediation.

Unit renovation economics
At $1,784 PSF, ICON units are priced low enough that a $30,000 renovation to modernise kitchen and bathrooms represents a modest percentage of total acquisition cost. Landlords who have refreshed their units report stronger tenant interest and faster leasing timelines. Given the 4.34% yield, even a modest rental uplift from renovation pays for itself within 2–3 years. This is a tangible advantage of buying older, lower-PSF stock in high-demand rental locations.
Unit Mix (from transaction data)
BedroomsTransactionsAvg PSFAvg Price
1 BR82$1,817$1,086,923
2 BR51$1,778$1,558,444
3 BR14$1,697$1,979,421

Pricing & Market Position

Across 147 recorded transactions (all-time), sale prices range from $980,000 to $2,380,000, averaging $1,335,512.

Over the last 12 months, transactions averaged $1,769 psf.

Rents range from $2,200 to $8,505 per month across 1,811 rental transactions. Current rental yield sits at approximately 4.4%.

ICON sits at the 1st percentile of District 2 condo PSF.

Rental Yield by Bedroom Type

Blended yield hides the spread between unit sizes — smaller units at ICON typically rent harder per dollar of purchase price:

Per-bedroom gross yield at ICON
TypeAvg RentAvg PriceGross Yield
1 BR$4,048/mo$1,086,9234.47%
2 BR$5,702/mo$1,558,4444.39%

Loading chart data...


Price Appreciation

From 2021 to 2026, the average PSF has appreciated by 5.6% (from $1,666 to $1,758 psf).

2024
+2.6%
$1,890 psf
2025
-4.4%
$1,807 psf
2026
-2.7%
$1,758 psf

ICON prices have cooled 7.0% from the 2024 peak, yet remain 5.6% above where the series began in 2021.


Neighbourhood Comparison

One Bernam ($2,587 PSF, 351 units, 99-year from 2021) is the most natural comparison — a new-launch CBD condominium on Bernam Street, approximately 600 metres from ICON. At a 45% PSF premium ($2,587 vs $1,784), One Bernam offers a fresh 99-year lease, modern finishes, and the full suite of contemporary facilities including sky terrace and rooftop pool. The lease advantage is decisive for CPF and financing: One Bernam’s 95+ year remaining lease means no CPF restrictions, maximum LTV, and straightforward mortgage terms. However, ICON’s 4.34% yield versus One Bernam’s expected 2.5–3.0% yield at launch pricing means ICON generates significantly more rental income per dollar invested. For a leveraged buyer prioritising asset preservation, One Bernam wins. For a cash buyer prioritising income, ICON’s 45% PSF discount buys meaningfully more yield.

Newport Residences ($3,127 PSF, freehold, 246 units) represents the premium end of the Tanjong Pagar market. The freehold tenure eliminates all lease-decay concerns and supports maximum financing flexibility. At a 75% PSF premium over ICON, Newport targets a fundamentally different buyer: one who prioritises long-term asset value and is willing to accept a lower yield (likely sub-2.5% gross at those PSF levels) in exchange for perpetual tenure. The comparison highlights ICON’s positioning as the value-and-yield play in a market where new launches are priced for capital appreciation, not rental returns. A Newport buyer is buying tenure; an ICON buyer is buying cash flow.

Skysuites@Anson ($2,229 PSF, 360 units, 99-year from 2011, TOP 2014) is the closest age-peer comparison in the immediate area. At a 25% premium, Skysuites offers a materially longer remaining lease (approximately 85 years vs ICON’s 75), which means Skysuites remains comfortably within CPF and LTV parameters for at least another decade. The 10-year lease difference matters more than the raw number suggests: ICON is at the threshold where financing tightens, while Skysuites still has headroom. Skysuites’ facilities are more contemporary (completed 2014 vs 2007), and the building is in better physical condition. For a buyer choosing between them, Skysuites offers the safer lease profile at a moderate premium; ICON offers a meaningfully higher yield if the lease constraint is manageable.

The PSF discount story is ICON’s strongest competitive argument. At $1,784 PSF, ICON trades at a 31% discount to One Bernam, 43% below Newport Residences, and 20% below Skysuites@Anson. In an era where new OCR (suburban) launches regularly exceed $2,000 PSF, buying a CCR address with 4 MRT stations within 500 metres at $1,784 PSF is, on a pure location-adjusted basis, one of the best value propositions in Singapore’s residential market. The catch — always the catch — is the 75-year lease. Every buyer must decide whether the yield premium justifies the lease decay, and there is no universal answer. For a 10-year income-focused hold with a planned exit, the math works. For a 30-year buy-and-hold, the lease erosion becomes increasingly punitive.

District 2 Comparables
DevelopmentTenureTOPUnits~Avg PSF
ICON99 yrs lease commencing from 20022007646$1,769
ONE BERNAM99 yrs lease commencing from 20192021364$2,588
NEWPORT RESIDENCESFreehold2026487$3,130
SKYSUITES@ANSON99 yrs lease commencing from 2008360$2,232
SKY EVERTONFreehold2021262$2,800
SPOTTISWOODE RESIDENCESFreehold2014351$2,209

Lease Decay Analysis

The 99-year lease runs from 2002, meaning approximately 24 years have already been consumed. Roughly 75 years remain — still comfortably within the range where most banks will offer full financing without restrictions.

Lease Milestones
YearLease remainingImplication
2026 (now)~75 yearsFull bank financing available
2032~69 yearsCPF usage still unrestricted for most buyers
2041~59 yearsApproaching 60-year threshold — CPF limits begin for some
2061~39 yearsSignificant financing restrictions for next buyer
2101ExpiryLease reverts to state

For a buyer purchasing today with a 10-year horizon (exit around 2036), the lease situation is essentially a non-issue — you’d be selling a property with ~65 years remaining, which is still very bankable. The risk profile changes for longer holds.


ShiokNest Scores

Our proprietary scoring system evaluates ICON across multiple dimensions.

Walkability
92/100
MRT: 25/25, School: 12/20, Hawker: 15/15, Mall: 15/15, Park: 10/10, Supermarket: 10/10, Clinic: 5/5
Investment
73/100
-4.8% YoY ·4.4% yield ·23 txns/yr ·75 yrs left ·0.28 km to MRT ·+19.8% district YoY ·En-bloc 38/100
Profitability
44/100
Win rate: 69 — 39 transaction pairs, 69% profitable, avg +$44,313
En-Bloc Potential
38/100
Verdict: Low
Overall ShiokNest Score
68/100 — composite of walkability, investment, profitability, en-bloc, and market trend factors.

What Residents Say

“The location is unbeatable. I walk to work in 10 minutes, Maxwell Food Centre is at my doorstep, and on weekends I’m spoiled for choice with Keong Saik and Duxton Hill bars. Four MRT stations within walking distance — I barely use my car anymore.”

— Resident review, CBD professional

“For the rent I’m paying, the facilities are basic compared to newer condos. The gym is small and the pool area could use a refresh. But honestly, I moved here for the location, not the condo amenities — and the location delivers every single day.”

— Tenant review via PropertyGuru

“I’ve owned a unit here for 8 years as an investment. Never had a vacancy longer than 2 weeks. The CBD rental demand is real — every time a tenant leaves, I have three new applicants within days. The yield makes up for the fact that the PSF isn’t going to the moon.”

— Owner-investor via 99.co

“The building is showing its age. Lift waiting times have gotten longer, and the common areas could use a refresh. Management is responsive to individual issues but the sinking fund discussion at the last AGM was concerning — major works are coming.”

— Resident review via PropertyGuru

“Best food neighbourhood in Singapore, hands down. Tian Tian chicken rice at Maxwell, craft cocktails on Duxton Hill, ramen on Tanjong Pagar Road, and the new coffee shops on Tras Street. I eat out every day and never repeat a restaurant in a month.”

— Resident, food enthusiast

The resident sentiment at ICON clusters around a single, consistent theme: location over amenities. Residents and tenants overwhelmingly praise the Tanjong Pagar precinct’s walkability, food scene, and MRT connectivity. The most enthusiastic reviews come from CBD professionals who have reduced or eliminated their commute. No resident describes ICON as a luxury living experience — but almost every resident describes it as a supremely convenient one.

The criticisms are equally consistent: dated facilities, ageing building systems, and a gym that does not meet the expectations set by newer developments. Long-term owners note that the building is entering the capital-expenditure phase where lifts, pumps, and common-area finishes need upgrading. The management is described as competent but not proactive. For investors, the tenant feedback is the most actionable data point: tenants consistently cite location as the reason they chose ICON, and the near-zero vacancy experience reported by multiple landlords validates the 1,683-rental-transaction data. Tenants come for the location, tolerate the facilities, and stay because the alternative is a longer commute.


Strengths & Weaknesses

Strengths
  • Exceptional 4.34% gross yield — one of the highest in the entire Core Central Region; income that rivals suburban developments
  • Massive rental demand: 1,683 rental transactions from 646 units — average unit rented ~2.6 times; near-zero vacancy reported by landlords
  • 4 MRT stations within 500m: Tanjong Pagar (280m), Shenton Way (420m), Prince Edward Road (440m), Maxwell (510m) — 3 separate lines
  • PSF 31–43% below competing condos: $1,784 vs One Bernam $2,587, Newport $3,127, Skysuites@Anson $2,229
  • Tanjong Pagar precinct: Maxwell Food Centre, Duxton Hill, Keong Saik Road — genuine neighbourhood life unlike sterile Marina Bay
  • Stable PSF trend: $1,770→$1,843→$1,890→$1,807→$1,834 — market has found clearing price; no decline spiral
  • Far East Organization build quality — Singapore's largest private developer; solid structural fundamentals
  • CBD walk-to-work proposition for Tanjong Pagar, Shenton Way, and Raffles Place office workers
  • Greater Southern Waterfront redevelopment will enhance precinct liveability over next 10–20 years
  • Lower maintenance fees than newer resort-style developments — compact facility set benefits yield-focused owners
Weaknesses
  • 75-year remaining lease at CPF threshold: reduced CPF usage, tightening LTV — financing constraints will worsen annually
  • 19-year-old building: facilities dated compared to post-2015 launches; gym, pool area, and common areas need refresh
  • Capital expenditure phase approaching: lifts, pumps, facade sealants due for major works — check sinking fund balance
  • No schools within 1 km — Cantonment Primary at 1.22 km is outside priority enrollment radius; unsuitable for young families
  • Unit finishes from 2007 require renovation ($20K–$40K) to remain competitive in rental market
  • Limited capital appreciation potential: lease decay will increasingly pressure resale PSF over next 10–20 years
  • Facilities score 6.0/10 — basic pool, small gym, BBQ area; no resort-style amenities that newer condos offer
  • Profitability score 47/100 — below average; many sellers have not achieved meaningful capital gains
  • Single-tower design means limited facing options — some lower-floor units face adjacent commercial buildings with restricted views
  • Sinking fund adequacy uncertain for upcoming major maintenance cycle — prospective buyers must review MCST financials

Who This Actually Suits

Buyers most likely to be happy here: mrt-walkable commuters, cbd walking distance, hawker / food enthusiasts and yield-focused investors. Located ~279m from Tanjong Pagar MRT, this property is a comfortable daily walk for transit commuters.

For foreign / absd-aware buyers, it can work — but weigh the trade-offs before committing.

It is a weaker fit for families with young children, long-term hold (10+ yr) and cpf-only buyers — other options likely serve them better. Family-suitable layout and CCR (Core Central Region) location with established school catchments nearby.


Verdict

ICON is not a glamorous purchase. It is a 19-year-old Far East Organization tower on a street most Singaporeans could not locate on a map. The facilities are adequate, not aspirational. The finishes need updating. The lease — 75 years — has crossed the CPF threshold that makes bankers and mortgage officers uncomfortable. There is no Green Heart, no infinity pool cantilevered over the skyline, no celebrity architect. On paper, it sounds deeply unremarkable.

And then you look at the numbers. A 4.34% gross rental yield — one of the highest in the Core Central Region. 1,683 rental transactions from 646 units — a rental velocity that proves, beyond any marketing claim, that tenants want to live here and keep coming back. An average PSF of $1,784 that is 31% below One Bernam ($2,587), 43% below Newport Residences ($3,127, freehold), and 20% below Skysuites@Anson ($2,229). Four MRT stations within 500 metres serving three lines. Maxwell Food Centre and Duxton Hill within walking distance. The PSF trend — $1,770 → $1,843 → $1,890 → $1,807 → $1,834 — is notably stable, oscillating in a tight band rather than declining, which suggests the market has found ICON’s clearing price.

The 75-year lease is the elephant in the room and must be addressed directly. At 75 years remaining, CPF usage is already reduced: buyers can only use CPF up to the Valuation Limit (VL), and the CPF withdrawal ceiling is capped at a lower amount than for properties with longer leases. As the lease decays further, banks will progressively tighten LTV ratios. For a buyer financing with maximum CPF and a 75% LTV mortgage, the numbers are already tighter than for a comparable freehold or fresh 99-year property. For a cash buyer or one with substantial equity, the financing constraints are manageable — and the yield premium arguably compensates for them. The critical question is not whether the lease matters (it does), but whether the accumulated rental income over a 10–15 year hold covers the expected capital depreciation from lease decay. At 4.34% yield, the answer is plausibly yes — provided rents remain stable.

The honest verdict: ICON is a pure income play in one of Singapore’s best-connected, most liveable CBD precincts. It is the right purchase for a cash-rich investor who prioritises monthly rental income over capital appreciation, who values the Tanjong Pagar lifestyle over the Marina Bay prestige, and who understands that the lease is a depreciating asset offset by an exceptional rental stream. It is the wrong purchase for anyone seeking capital gains, anyone stretching on CPF and mortgage limits, or anyone who needs a 1 km school catchment. Buy ICON for what it is — a high-yield workhorse in a world-class location — not for what you wish it were.

HDB Alternatives Nearby

Weighing ICON against staying public? These HDB towns sit within walking or short-drive distance:

  • Central Area — 4-room average $1,088,814 (200m away), an upgrader gap of about $250,000
  • Bukit Merah — 4-room average $894,787 (450m away), an upgrader gap of about $450,000

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is ICON's rental yield so high compared to other CCR condos?
Three factors converge. First, the PSF ($1,784) is 31–43% below competing newer condos, so the denominator in the yield calculation is low. Second, the average rent ($4,523/month) is strong because CBD professionals will pay a premium for a 3-minute walk to Tanjong Pagar MRT and 4 MRT stations within 500m. Third, the Tanjong Pagar precinct has genuine lifestyle appeal (Maxwell Food Centre, Duxton Hill, Keong Saik) that drives tenant demand beyond pure convenience. The 1,683 rental transactions — roughly 2.6 per unit — prove this demand is not theoretical.
How does the 75-year remaining lease affect CPF usage and financing?
At 75 years remaining, CPF usage is reduced: the CPF withdrawal ceiling is capped, and the amount of CPF you can use is limited by the formula (remaining lease minus buyer's age at purchase must be at least 20 years for any CPF usage). Banks will also apply tighter LTV ratios — expect 60–70% rather than the standard 75%. For a 35-year-old buyer, CPF is still usable but capped. For a 50-year-old buyer, CPF restrictions are severe. Cash or substantial equity is increasingly necessary, which narrows the buyer pool but also reduces competition for those who can transact.
Is the building well-maintained for a 19-year-old development?
ICON benefits from Far East Organization build quality — the structural fundamentals are solid. However, at 19 years, the development is entering the major capital expenditure phase where lifts, water pumps, facade sealants, and common area finishes require upgrading or replacement. Prospective buyers should request the latest MCST financial statements and AGM minutes to review the sinking fund balance and any upcoming special levies. A well-funded sinking fund is a positive signal; a shortfall means potential special assessments.
How does ICON compare to One Bernam as a rental investment?
One Bernam ($2,587 PSF) offers a fresh 99-year lease, modern finishes, and full CPF/financing flexibility — but at a 45% price premium. ICON's 4.34% yield versus One Bernam's expected 2.5–3.0% means ICON generates roughly 45–75% more rental income per dollar invested. The trade-off is clear: One Bernam preserves capital better (fresh lease, new building) while ICON maximises income. For a cash buyer with a 10-year horizon focused on rental returns, ICON's cumulative income advantage is substantial. For a leveraged buyer focused on total return, One Bernam's lease and financing profile is safer.
Will the Greater Southern Waterfront benefit ICON?
The Greater Southern Waterfront (GSW) is a multi-decade URA master plan to transform the waterfront from Marina South through Keppel to Pasir Panjang. For ICON, the benefits are indirect but real: improved precinct amenities, new parks and waterfront promenades, better transport links, and a more vibrant neighbourhood. However, the GSW will also introduce significant new residential supply that could compete for tenants and buyers. Net impact on ICON is likely neutral-to-positive for rental demand (more reasons for professionals to live in the area) but neutral-to-negative for capital values (more competing supply, and new launches will have fresh leases).
What is the realistic exit strategy for ICON?
The optimal strategy is a 10–15 year income-focused hold with a planned exit while the remaining lease is still above 60 years (i.e., before 2037). During this period, the 4.34% yield generates meaningful income that can offset modest capital depreciation from lease decay. Beyond 60 years remaining, CPF and financing restrictions tighten further, significantly narrowing the buyer pool and pressuring resale values. En-bloc potential exists (score: 38/100) but should not be relied upon as a primary exit strategy. The pragmatic approach is to collect the yield, plan the exit timeline, and treat any en-bloc outcome as a bonus.
Data as of May 2026

Latest recorded data point: May 2026 · 147 records analysed · Source: URA private-sale caveats